4 ms·
>I can say "dang should ban.." It is your free expression to make that argument, but the argument itself is against free expression. >incapable of censorship
by beerandt 5y ago
>I can say "dang should ban.."
It is your free expression to make that argument, but the argument itself is against free expression.
>incapable of censorship
That's a mighty narrow definition of censorship. (I didn't say government censorship or even mention the 1st amendment.)
What is it that you would call Young's implied request to Spotify, if not an ultimatum to censor? Especially given the context that his demand is founded on opposing the content of Rogan's speech, and that he is attempting to leverage an authoritative power (Spotify) to unilaterally remove Rogan's published media and prevent it's distribution.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]