>nor is opposition to GMO technology an immediate grave threat to public health The complete lack of awareness of the hypocrisy is why it's relevant. If you t

>nor is opposition to GMO technology an immediate grave threat to public health The complete lack of awareness of the hypocrisy is why it's relevant. If you took crop GMO, got rid of the one-time gene modification, but instead, started growing the unmodified plant... and then just directly injected those modified genes such that billions of cells began expressing/building proteins from the modified genes... ...you'd end up with almost exactly the mRNA vaccine technology. (Well, if it worked on plants.) But the 100% plant process that doesn’t rely on in-situ gene transfer or modification is dangerous to grow and eat, while the viral process that involves intentional gene transfer into human cells, and said cells manufacturing the very part of the virus that makes it so effective at cellular invasion...is unquestionably safe to inject? That's why opposition to GMO is relevant. It's completely contradictory and heretical to question the science of one while faithfully crusading for the other.