3 ms·
The founders recently were on the podcast Intelligence ² US. I really liked the idea, but at one point they were asked about a recent controversy that was desc
by Auracle 5y ago
The founders recently were on the podcast Intelligence ² US.
I really liked the idea, but at one point they were asked about a recent controversy that was described as a professor writing that not all pedophiles are offenders. They were asked if that kind of speech would be allowed, and they gave a very unclear answer.
To be fair I didn’t look up all what that professor said, but if you claim to be a bastion of free speech but already think there’s a line somewhere that can’t be crossed before your university is up and running… That doesn’t bode well for how things will actually turn out.
- yarg 5y agoIs it controversial to state that not all paedophiles are molesters?
- Auracle 5y agoI just looked it up. They advocated changing the terminology to “minor-attracted persons/people.” I agree with the critics in that seems like a way to destigmatize pedophiles, but I also think our current policies on pedophilia do nothing but force them underground. If the end goal is to prevent children getting molested, we need to somehow break down the barrier of treatment. I don’t know much about this, but I would think that treatment would be medications that suppress their sex drive. I guess I would personally advocate a way for those medications to be taken anonymously. That’s neither here nor there, of course. Free speech isn’t free speech if it isn’t absolute, and as long as there was a good argument with the above I would think it would be welcome at this university. Apparently not, though.