4 ms·
What? Science isn’t science because humans can’t be properly controlled for a study? Are you implying a study over a billion people over their lifespan wouldn’t
by wyre 5y ago
What? Science isn’t science because humans can’t be properly controlled for a study? Are you implying a study over a billion people over their lifespan wouldn’t be worth pursuing because it can’t be controlled? That’s ridiculous if you are. The study doesn’t even say it’s causative, but associated.
- ComradePhil 5y ago> Science isn’t science because humans can’t be properly controlled for a study? No, non-science isn't science just because someone wants it to be. > Are you implying a study over a billion people over their lifespan wouldn’t be worth pursuing because it can’t be controlled? It should be pursued, and correlations explored and studied but the findings should be presented as what they are.