2 ms·
That's because we've seen where that brand of socialism (and anarchy) leads --> authoritarianism. It has never worked on anything bigger than the village level.
by stjohnswarts 5y ago
That's because we've seen where that brand of socialism (and anarchy) leads --> authoritarianism. It has never worked on anything bigger than the village level. You need abstract means of exchange (money) to get people on a large scale to cooperate. People in my village do not care about people two villages over who they only ever barely met let alone someone hundreds of miles away.
- filoeleven 5y agoWe have all heard the horror stories of those notorious authoritarian hellholes like Denmark and Canada and Italy and South Korea and… Public ownership of certain systems does not imply abolishing money.