3 ms·
Bufferbloat is something that seems counterintuitive at first glance. Why would adding a bigger buffer hurt performance?
by cortesoft 5y ago
Bufferbloat is something that seems counterintuitive at first glance. Why would adding a bigger buffer hurt performance?
- dtaht 5y agoQueue theory in general applies not just to supply chains, or bufferbloat, but explains a lot about how to do JIT and other forms of "traffic scheduling". Not enough people have read Len Kleinrock's wonderful books on this subject, and they are long out of print, and available only on archive.org. I wish it were taught more. His Queue Theory volume 2 is one of the most well-thumbed books on my bookshelf.
- Aachen 5y agoPost an answer :) Here it will get lost (semi-ephemerality is imo one of the disadvantages of HN), on stackexchange people will find it.
- pphysch 5y agoCan analysis of bufferbloat help us understand the current state of the US/global economy? (Money = buffered economic value; too much liquidity = bufferbloat?)
- neffy 5y agoIt's not a bad idea per se, but no. The actual issue is too much debt, alongside too concentrated money. The issue at some level is some buffers are far too big, and 70% of the US population doesn't have any buffers at all.
- pphysch 5y agoI agree that debt is the underlying issue, but if we consider that the Fed's only solution to the "network issues" is to "increase the buffer sizes across the backbone" then perhaps "bufferbloat" is contributing to some of the supply chain issues.
- digikata 5y agoAnd this would have logistical parallels with the just-in-time inventory strategy. which imho has been a maligned in that it does trade off other risks, but it also makes for better supply chain responsiveness (if the buffers are selected correctly on the right items). Selecting appropriate buffer sizes is critical - a good set of comparisons there is what buffer would one want for streaming a movie vs a buffer for streaming a live video meeting connection.
- tome 5y agoJIT has been maligned by those who don't realise that in the original Toyota conception one's suppliers should be right there with you on site. Supply chains stretching across the oceans just aren't a thing in properly done JIT.
- kqr 5y agoWell... part of the purpose of just in time is to surface problems quickly. Transient problems in an upstream process can be papered over by inventory on the receiving end, but when you remove that inventory everyone gets a clearer view of where the problem is, and everyone can do a better job of fixing it. So just in time over the oceans works precisely as intended: it gives us information immediately when there is a problem. Whether or not it's within any manufacturers power to fix those problems is a separate issue. (And I'm going to guess that there's no easy way to fix those problems, given that Toyota has opted for more inventory to hide those sorts of transient issues when it comes to certain parts.)
- throwaway29303 5y agohttps://apenwarr.ca/log/20170814 https://apenwarr.ca/log/20170814