4 ms·
i think this is an AI-complete problem. Lawyers write contracts in legalese not because they love obfuscation (although some clearly do), but because it is basi
by phpnode 15y ago
i think this is an AI-complete problem. Lawyers write contracts in legalese not because they love obfuscation (although some clearly do), but because it is basically a DSL that tries to represent a set of terms in the least ambiguous way possible. To translate these documents into simpler language would require the translator (human or machine) to have a proper understanding of the content being translated, hence AI-complete. Also, the newly simplified contract would be a separate entity from the original contract, and therefore could be interpreted differently by a court. Anyone attempting to do this is opening themselves up to all sorts of horrible litigation
- revorad 15y agoThose are good points, but do you think MarketBrief is solving an AI-complete problem? There must be low-tech, semi-automated, crowdsourced solutions to this problem. The legal implications might be a problem, but maybe a community site with clear disclaimers can avoid any trouble. Even highlighting or extracting key parts of the original document would be useful.
- phpnode 15y agono, as far as I can tell MarketBrief is a different thing entirely: they're generating their content from statistics, not by comprehending and rewriting existing texts. I think the essence is this - you can probably summarize these contracts and highlight important clauses with a crowd sourced solution as you suggest, but these summaries are just an interpretation of the contract, they can't replace the real thing.
- mcherm 15y agoNevertheless, a summary of the important points in the agreements would be EXTREMELY useful to me. Unless I go to court I probably don't care whether it is the law or the law AND the arbitration that is based on the legal framework of California USA. But I do care whether or not there is a clause that says "You Can't Sue Us" in one language or another.