4 ms·
No. It will lead to a terrible Nash equilibrium as far towards the donor class's interests as possible while still giving the voters the illusion of choice and
by rjbwork 5y ago
No. It will lead to a terrible Nash equilibrium as far towards the donor class's interests as possible while still giving the voters the illusion of choice and enough of a quorum to provide airs of legitimacy.
- BobbyJo 5y agoWhat's the alternative? Resources, in a very direct, physical, way afford one power. As soon as you allow unequal distribution of resources, you create unequal power. The fact that the 'donor class' are put on a leash to the degree that most demand be done means things are working well no?