3 ms·
I have been bit by the lack of greppability for traits a few times. I love the trait system, but I wish there was a way to track back to definitions without rel
by SquibblesRedux 5y ago
I have been bit by the lack of greppability for traits a few times. I love the trait system, but I wish there was a way to track back to definitions without relying on the IDE of the day. It reminds me of old C++ nightmare scenarios where the original developers would overload all the operators and bury all sorts of redefinitions in an endless hierarchy of includes.