3 ms·

The article makes those claims, based mostly on anecdotal evidence rather than a peer-reviewed scientifically rigorous study. It concludes with: "Giving credit

by biot 15y ago

The article makes those claims, based mostly on anecdotal evidence rather than a peer-reviewed scientifically rigorous study. It concludes with: "Giving credit where it is due, many of the IT managers we interviewed reiterated that Intel's SLC-based SSDs are the shining standard by which others are measured." While an itemized breakdown by datacenter isn't available one datacenter (InterServer.net, with fewer than 100 SSDs) says: "Intel SSD's are night and day in failure rates when it comes to some other drives. For example the SuperTalent SSD drives have had an extremely high failure rate including model FTM32GL25H, FTM32G225H, and FTM32GX25H. I estimate about two-thirds of these drives have failed since being put into service. With these failures however, the drives were not recoverable at all. They generally disappeared completely, no longer being readable. Spinners die much more gracefully with an easier disk recovery. I cannot compare this to the Intel's SSDs yet since I have not experienced any failures.". They apparently use Intel's X25-E (SSDSA2SH032G1GN).

moe 15y ago
They generally disappeared completely, no longer being readable. Spinners die much more gracefully with an easier disk recovery. That's a weird thing to say. In a datacenter you want your disks to be fail-fast. I.e. you want them to drop out of the array early and cleanly. Nobody "recovers" harddrives in a datacenter, you just swap them. The worst failure-mode (that is still way too commonly seen) is that of the "lame drive" that grows bad sectors, predictive failures and all that jazz over time, causing bus-resets, confused controllers and bringing the whole array to a crawl until a human steps in. That said, my experience with SSDs in that regard isn't too good either. I've seen them fail cleanly but I've also seen a single failing Vertex lock up a LSI-controller hard...

by biot 15y ago

moe 15y ago

They generally disappeared completely, no longer being readable. Spinners die much more gracefully with an easier disk recovery. That's a weird thing to say. In a datacenter you want your disks to be fail-fast. I.e. you want them to drop out of the array early and cleanly. Nobody "recovers" harddrives in a datacenter, you just swap them. The worst failure-mode (that is still way too commonly seen) is that of the "lame drive" that grows bad sectors, predictive failures and all that jazz over time, causing bus-resets, confused controllers and bringing the whole array to a crawl until a human steps in. That said, my experience with SSDs in that regard isn't too good either. I've seen them fail cleanly but I've also seen a single failing Vertex lock up a LSI-controller hard...