3 ms·
This is a really fun and interesting book to read, assuming you can find a copy and read Russian. For additional background on the book, the authors and an ear
by diskzero 5y ago
This is a really fun and interesting book to read, assuming you can find a copy and read Russian.
For additional background on the book, the authors and an earlier work by them, check out an interview them here:
Part 1: https://geek-week.imtqy.com/articles/en490092/index.html https://geek-week.imtqy.com/articles/en490092/index.html
Part 2: https://geek-week.imtqy.com/articles/en490918/index.html https://geek-week.imtqy.com/articles/en490918/index.html
- Jtsummers 5y agoSince you (apparently) can read it, page 15 frame 12 of the book (in the original link, he's "cutting" a potato with the knife's handle). Is that lambda calculus? My understanding is that "К" in Cyrillic is the same "K" sound as in the Latin alphabet, but it looks like a typical lambda calculus expression: λ x . x (identity function). And it makes sense, cutting a potato with the handle leaves it unchanged. I'm just curious why the symbol К is used (visual similarity to λ?) and wondering if there are other similar lambda calculus jokes or references in the book.
- pvg 5y agoIt's just the khhh sound of scraping the potato with the handle. Sort of like the POW! in an English language comic is not about exponentiation.
- Jtsummers 5y agoI also thought about that, and thought it might be the case. It just amused me that it worked both ways (if you take the К as an alternative to λ) and I was curious if it was anywhere else in the book. And in an English language comic about math I could see POW (or similar) being used in both ways, as both the conventional sound sense and in a joking math sense (in some context). Since this is a comic about computers, the lambda calculus interpretation (even as a throwaway joke that would go over the reader's head) seemed plausible.
- pvg 5y agoRight but I think the typography/scan quality and not being able to read the rest of the text for context is leading you astray here - this book is roughly at the level of the more basic Usborne books. It's a long, long way from mentioning lambda calculus.