3 ms·
Huh? I'm not stating any personal opinions about race in the workplace here, and I don't appreciate you casting me as having done so. I was saying that you seem
by totalZero 5y ago
Huh? I'm not stating any personal opinions about race in the workplace here, and I don't appreciate you casting me as having done so. I was saying that you seem to have misinterpreted other guy's post as a false contrapositive.
Note the "I think the point was," and also the "If I'm interpreting GP properly."
Let me make it clearer for you:
"If the canary is alive, there's oxygen."
That was the GP argument. It's not the same logical proposition as,
"If there's no canary, there's no oxygen."
Please drop the flagrant language. You're way off base.
- geoduck14 5y ago>I'm not stating any personal opinions about race in the workplace here, and I don't appreciate you casting me as having done so. I, too, interpreted your original comment as "agreeing with" the original poster. Your line about "If I'm interpreting GP properly." Came at the very end - after I (incorrectly) assumed you were aligned with GP My conclusion is that this format isn't very good at difficult conversations
- totalZero 5y ago> My conclusion is that this format isn't very good at difficult conversations I can agree with that.