3 ms·
The author goes into problems caused by the inherent differences between writing a book and making a movie. >I think there’s one question left to be answered h
by jpmoral 5y ago
The author goes into problems caused by the inherent differences between writing a book and making a movie.
>I think there’s one question left to be answered here, and that’s why Peter Jackson? Why? And I think we can answer this question, because while Jackson’s arrangement makes about no military sense at all, in terms of film construction, it makes a lot of sense.
< problems listed and explained here >
>So while mashing the operational context of this sequence into unrecognizable mush saddens me, I have to say I honestly cannot see a better way to do it while still resolving these problems, keeping in mind the strict restrictions on screentime (which makes adding an Edoras-Éowyn B-plot – technically a C-plot, since this is the B-plot to Frodo’s A-plot – effectively impossible). Alas that it came at the cost of my beloved logistics studies, but as far as sins of adaptation go, this one is a reasonable and necessary evil.
- bell-cot 5y agoYes. And the (excellent, IMO) author said many more such things (about movie-making requiring that reality be carted off to the rubbish tip) in the rest of the series. Though there are also fair number of places where the author concluded that Peter Jackson has no excuse but "ignorant, and didn't care". Hence my "stick to books" (and certain magazines, and web sites like HN, and ...) conclusion.