3 ms·
I'm specifically replying to this: > Once humans are put into that setting (zero education), we are no longer comfortably at the top of the food-chain. Which
by otabdeveloper4 5y ago
I'm specifically replying to this:
> Once humans are put into that setting (zero education), we are no longer comfortably at the top of the food-chain.
Which isn't true. Humans used to hunt mammoths way back when we had zero education. (Some even claim that we hunted them to extinction.)
It doesn't get really get more 'top of the food chain' than that.
- Maursault 5y ago> It doesn't get really get more 'top of the food chain' than that. Sure it does. Aside from giant birds, crocodiles, and leopards, early humans likely had to contend with bears, sabertooth cats, snakes, hyenas, Komodo dragons, and even other hominins. As prey, the past was not a pleasant place for humans and our ancestors, because they were prey, not apex predators. You know, apex means nothing eats it. Just last year an alligator ate a man in Louisiana and they will again. That sort of disqualifies our species as "apex." The alligator is an apex predator because nothing predates them. Making sense yet?