3 ms·
I think this is a good move simply because the two divisions have contradictory goals at this point. For example, the Qwikster division should be looking at fi
by TomOfTTB 15y ago
I think this is a good move simply because the two divisions have contradictory goals at this point.
For example, the Qwikster division should be looking at finding ways to deliver DVDs quicker (Kiosks for example). But that's not something that would ever occur to Netflix because they're focused on streaming as the future.
Which is where the contradiction comes in. It is hard to run a business unit when the goal of the company overall is to kill off your unit.
That said I think announcing it today is foolish. Even if it was their original plan to do so announcing it right after a stock drop makes the decision look rash. IMHO they should have put this announcement off for a couple weeks.
- earbitscom 15y agoI don't think any shareholders of consequence are going to think they just made this decision a day ago. Maybe they announced it after the stock plummeted because the assumption is it won't go down that much further, where a 2nd announcement after it rebounded might send it down yet again.
- barista 15y agoAlso I don't get the creating of a new brand altogether. Netflix is a popular brand and a household name. Who knows qwikster? Looks indicative of a future split up of the company to me.
- Aron 15y agoIn terms of stock timing, I have a hard time believing that this kind of move was completely held secret. This takes a lot of prep work, and whispering has to go on, and rumors spread fast to connected people who can profit. I suspect the excessive reaction last week to the news of that week may have actually been boosted by inside knowledge about this move today. So if any of that's true, you can't exactly assume that last week's stock move would have been the same in an alternate world where they weren't going to announce this today. At any rate, appearances generally give way to fact eventually.