4 ms·
I agree that not seating the person who won their local election is a big problem. You mentioned you don’t want their politics to succeed. I just was saying thi
by anfilt 5y ago
I agree that not seating the person who won their local election is a big problem. You mentioned you don’t want their politics to succeed. I just was saying this is a non-policy position. Further, when it comes to how tax money is spent a Libertarian generally is gonna make certain it is spent as approved and allowed so the concern about policy is a tad misplaced.
Like I am not sure which type of communist you are, but if you are along the lines of an anarcho-communist or the lib-left area. All I was saying the main disagreements between the two are regarding business and property ownership. For a lot of things there is a lot of overlap. (They both are south on the basic compass after all) Although some big L libertarians are very hardcore capitalists so I can understand your concerns. Although yea this is a bit of a tangent. I guess all I was trying to say was I am not sure why the concern for a non-policy position.
- eyelidlessness 5y agoI’m saying I have repeatedly tried to express a strong disinterest in discussing the political difference in this context, and I’ve repeatedly clarified that. Clarifying your engagement isn’t going to change my unwillingness to participate, here, where I clearly described my politics to support a candidate with whom I disagree.
- anfilt 5y agoUnderstood.
- eyelidlessness 5y agoThank you! I sincerely appreciate it.