3 ms·
This isn't even just a question of individual responsibility. Yes, suckers will get fleeced and we will have to cope with that as a society. Yes, we should mini
by arcticbull 5y ago
This isn't even just a question of individual responsibility. Yes, suckers will get fleeced and we will have to cope with that as a society. Yes, we should minimize that harm to the extent possible. However, there is a much broader systemic risk involved.
In 1997, Albania was transitioning from a communist state to a market economy. This created a power vacuum and a distrust in the institutions of government and finance. This allowed MLMs/pyramid schemes to blink into existence and multiply out of all proportion. At its peak, almost half of the entire GDP of Albania was locked up in them. "When the schemes collapsed, there was uncontained rioting, the government fell, and the country descended into anarchy and a near civil war in which some 2,000 people were killed." [1]
This isn't all fun and games and innocent gambling. This is a cancerous symptom of the failing of the state.
[1] https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2000/03/jarvis.htm https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2000/03/jarvis.ht...
- maest 5y agoRomania had something similar going on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caritas_(Ponzi_scheme) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caritas_(Ponzi_scheme) > An estimate of Romanian newspaper România Liberă gives the amount of money involved as 1.4 trillion lei or about 20% of the 1993 expenditures of the Romanian government of 6.6 trillion. The New York Times estimated the scheme attracted between $1 billion and $5 billion Anecdotally, people got involved in it fully knowing it was a Ponzi scheme, but hoping they could get their money out before the music stopped playing. And some of them did! In fact, my first computer was bought by my parents with Caritas money.