3 ms·
This is why I think Google deciding to help Intel get into the mobile game was a poor strategic decision on Google's part. If Intel becomes a strong player in
by nextparadigms 15y ago
This is why I think Google deciding to help Intel get into the mobile game was a poor strategic decision on Google's part. If Intel becomes a strong player in the mobile market, who do you think will benefit the most from it? Google? No. Microsoft. Because then they can get back to using x86 chips, while Google's doesn't gain much of anything, since competition in the ARM market was already strong enough, and Intel was far from "necessary".
Unless, Google's plan is to get Android on more x86 (older) machines, once the OS matures a bit more, and become a real OS choice for people using Windows today. But we'll see if that's their real plan, and if it is, how it will go.
Until then I still think Google's decision to help Intel take over the mobile market (if that's even possible at this point) will turn out to be a very bad decision for Android's future, as it will allow Windows a backdoor to get back on track. Google should realize that hurting Intel means hurting Microsoft.
- notatoad 15y agoAt this stage, arm and cross platform web apps are here to stay. Improving x86 won't make arm less relevant, Google has nothing to gain by attempting to suppress x86. they've already won this battle.
- hga 15y ago"If Intel becomes a strong player in the mobile market, who do you think will benefit the most from it? Google? No. Microsoft." But Google's hardware related efforts (along with many others) are a means to the end of ensuring their core business doesn't get shut out by one or more gatekeepers. If Microsoft benefits more in this narrow sense I'm sure that's OK with Google, as long as they don't use that to substitute their own advertising system for Google's.