4 ms·
Isn't that what this discussion is about? The OP said that it costs the taxpayers $1. I don't know about this specific situation - but the claim does not seem t
by obmelvin 5y ago
Isn't that what this discussion is about? The OP said that it costs the taxpayers $1. I don't know about this specific situation - but the claim does not seem to be about paying directly for things.
- specialist 5y agoAngelers pay govt fees for priviledge to fish. The government subsidizes commercial fishers. Add everything up, positive ROI for angelers, negative ROI for commercial.