3 ms·

Nope, I wouldn’t agree, sorry. You’re attempting to redefine the gender characteristic “man” in terms of physical sex characteristics “male”, which isn’t valid

Nope, I wouldn’t agree, sorry. You’re attempting to redefine the gender characteristic “man” in terms of physical sex characteristics “male”, which isn’t valid; this invalidity is proven by the existence of both intersex men and intersex women. You’re also using the invalid term “biological sex” to refer to “sex at birth”, which can be male, female, or intersex — but due to your imprecise phrasing, your use could also refer to “current sex”, which is a modifiable state that can be altered surgically and thus invalidates your point further. Minor49er, I don’t think you’re participating in good faith here. You’ve presented a view that doesn’t stand up to the facts after repeatedly being confronted with them in multiple threads, your concluding question “Don’t you agree?” is a direct quote from the sealioning comic, and you’ve asked the mods to delete this post in a different thread while continuing to engage here. You’ll need to shop your anti-trans trolling elsewhere, as it’s not productive for me to engage with you further.

Nicksil 5y ago
- floatingatoll 5y ago
  Hi, and welcome to this post and discussion for the first time. If you’d like to register a complaint with the mods about my participation here, you can email them directly at the footer contact link.
Minor49er 5y ago
I'm not redefining gender characteristics or anything of the sort. I'm genuinely curious how biological sex, which is physically based, is discarded in favor of a description of an idea of gender that only exists in the mind. "Sex at birth" implies that the biology can change after birth, which it cannot. To me, it seems that it's not in good faith to categorize "trans women" only as "women" and reject the idea that they can be categorized as "men" at all. And yes, I asked the mods to delete the story because obviously a lot of posts have been getting flagged. The story appears to be causing a lot of strong responses either for or against Giggle, its community, and its owner. It's simply not resulting in constructive discussion. I mean, you're even accusing me of "ignoring facts" (?) and of being an "anti-trans troll". Also, what's the sealioning comic?

Nicksil 5y ago

floatingatoll 5y ago
Hi, and welcome to this post and discussion for the first time. If you’d like to register a complaint with the mods about my participation here, you can email them directly at the footer contact link.

Minor49er 5y ago

I'm not redefining gender characteristics or anything of the sort. I'm genuinely curious how biological sex, which is physically based, is discarded in favor of a description of an idea of gender that only exists in the mind. "Sex at birth" implies that the biology can change after birth, which it cannot. To me, it seems that it's not in good faith to categorize "trans women" only as "women" and reject the idea that they can be categorized as "men" at all. And yes, I asked the mods to delete the story because obviously a lot of posts have been getting flagged. The story appears to be causing a lot of strong responses either for or against Giggle, its community, and its owner. It's simply not resulting in constructive discussion. I mean, you're even accusing me of "ignoring facts" (?) and of being an "anti-trans troll". Also, what's the sealioning comic?