3 ms·

Vaccines can potentially be mandated for entire populations and funded by the US taxpayer for distribution around the world and require adjustments several time

Vaccines can potentially be mandated for entire populations and funded by the US taxpayer for distribution around the world and require adjustments several times per year. The development of new related vaccines of this type is apparently quite cheap and straightforward (this was boasted about at various points over the last few years) and vaccines are also pretty unique in the way that manufacturers can effectively be immune from liability. Add in the magic word Pandemic, with careful orchestration from public health authorities and politicians I think you can have a dream combination of volume, revenue and commercial risk limitation.

Vrondi 5y ago
Yes, as a person with a medical history of immune system disorder triggered by a vaccine, I am repeatedly astonished that the medical system and government keep claiming things we don't yet have data for, and trying to force _everyone_ to take these vaccines for which there is no legal recourse. The vaccine that gave me an auto-immune reaction is part of the established system that will allow some compensation to some victims. These new vaccines are too new, and not yet even eligible to be listed there, and so if your immune system reacts to one of the new vaccines by attacking your own body, it's not even eligible to be legally considered to give you compensation. But they're safe. Everyone should have them. Lucky you if it ruins your body or life.
- brippalcharrid 5y ago
  Also, those compensation schemes are run by the government. And it's worth mentioning that a lot of the research and development costs are borne by government departments as well (eg. via Fauci), but the IP is retained by those private companies. With which there is a revolving door of personnel from government and regulatory bodies. And that's before we get into the potential for vaccinations to be suppressing people's innate immunity and creating a raft of new medical conditions that would in turn require new pharmaceuticals to be developed.
- jjeaff 5y ago
  I'm not sure that the distinction means much. I don't think anyone has been able to successfully collect anything from that compensation fund offered by the government in decades.

Vrondi 5y ago

Yes, as a person with a medical history of immune system disorder triggered by a vaccine, I am repeatedly astonished that the medical system and government keep claiming things we don't yet have data for, and trying to force _everyone_ to take these vaccines for which there is no legal recourse. The vaccine that gave me an auto-immune reaction is part of the established system that will allow some compensation to some victims. These new vaccines are too new, and not yet even eligible to be listed there, and so if your immune system reacts to one of the new vaccines by attacking your own body, it's not even eligible to be legally considered to give you compensation. But they're safe. Everyone should have them. Lucky you if it ruins your body or life.

brippalcharrid 5y ago
Also, those compensation schemes are run by the government. And it's worth mentioning that a lot of the research and development costs are borne by government departments as well (eg. via Fauci), but the IP is retained by those private companies. With which there is a revolving door of personnel from government and regulatory bodies. And that's before we get into the potential for vaccinations to be suppressing people's innate immunity and creating a raft of new medical conditions that would in turn require new pharmaceuticals to be developed.
jjeaff 5y ago
I'm not sure that the distinction means much. I don't think anyone has been able to successfully collect anything from that compensation fund offered by the government in decades.