4 ms·

I want to know if they’re using Rosetta on their M1 test machine or running it natively. Hopefully this patch leads to a proper darwin/arm64 release so I don’t

I want to know if they’re using Rosetta on their M1 test machine or running it natively. Hopefully this patch leads to a proper darwin/arm64 release so I don’t have to use this weird fork[0] with a private GitHub Action to get a native build. The Rosetta version is considerably slower. 0: https://github.com/carlosonunez/obs-installer-for-apple-silicon#download-experimental-official-build-v120-and-above https://github.com/carlosonunez/obs-installer-for-apple-sili...

lelandfe 5y ago
> I want to know if they’re using Rosetta on their M1 test machine or running it natively Natively. There's an open PR[0], #5155, to get OBS native on Apple Silicon. That's also what your weird fork uses. Apple's PR is on top of that work: you'll see that there are 10 or so initial commits. Thus #5155 will need to be merged first, before Apple's. #5155 is a huge PR and has been open for 5 months. Its release will also necessitate OBS get an M1 testing solution figured out. Here's a quote[2] from an OBS team member two days ago: > [This PR is] top of our priority list once we release 27.2. We're keenly aware of how badly people want a native Apple Silicon build, and I can assure you that we will definitely be publishing official test builds of OBS with M1 support as soon as we are able. I would nevertheless expect for all of this to take quite a while. [0] https://github.com/obsproject/obs-studio/pull/5155 https://github.com/obsproject/obs-studio/pull/5155 [1] https://github.com/obsproject/obs-studio/pull/5155#issuecomment-1022340082 https://github.com/obsproject/obs-studio/pull/5155#issuecomm...
- jagger27 5y ago
  Thanks!