3 ms·

I agree with all of your points except the last - I’m guessing you dont read “RWM”? https://www.wsj.com/articles/mit-professor-gang-chen-says-misunderstanding-

• sigmaprimus 5y ago
  You are right. I apologize for injecting a subject that has no relevance to the conversation, sometimes I forget that doing so is not within HN guidelines. (And by right I obviously mean correct, although it is an interesting double entendre!)
  • jaywalk 5y ago
    The WSJ article is objectively better than the NYT article, too. It gives much more info about what he was actually accused of, and how the case fell apart. So instead of just apologizing for bringing it up, maybe you should work to recalibrate your views.