4 ms·
In this case it looks their work is based on another branch not yet merged (https://github.com/obsproject/obs-studio/pull/5155 https://github.com/obsproject/obs
by n3_ 5y ago
In this case it looks their work is based on another branch not yet merged (https://github.com/obsproject/obs-studio/pull/5155 https://github.com/obsproject/obs-studio/pull/5155 which adds support for Apple Silicon) - and the commit is from there.
- Applejinx 5y agoLooking forward to that: I'm going to be needing to use OBS on Apple Silicon.
- mikkelam 5y agoI honestly thought it already was running natively, it already runs super smooth in rosetta
- ziml77 5y agoRosetta is incredibly impressive. And I guess it needed to be. The switch to ARM was going to be a hard sell without a fast x86 translation layer. I'm hoping though that devs don't use it as an excuse to never release ARM builds of their software. It would be good to have ARM builds across all the major operating systems.
- dagmx 5y agoI fully expect devs to drag their feet. This happens with every transition in Apple history. It takes pulling the rug out completely before many devs will do it Look at the Python transition, the carbon to cocoa transition, even the original Rosetta transition.
- PostThisTooFast 5y ago
- krallja 5y agoGithub can point the PR at that branch and those commits won’t show up anymore.
- da_chicken 5y agoYes, and the author was asked to base the PR on 5155: https://github.com/obsproject/obs-studio/pull/5875#issuecomment-1023529237 https://github.com/obsproject/obs-studio/pull/5875#issuecomm... And it looks like they're just going to set the PR to a draft until after 5155 is merged, so it will get cleaned up and be easier to review then: https://github.com/obsproject/obs-studio/pull/5875#issuecomment-1024151853 https://github.com/obsproject/obs-studio/pull/5875#issuecomm... HN is usually better about sussing out the real story.