3 ms·
It's hilarious that in an antitrust case, you would suggest charging 30% for everyone but 10% for some self-selected group through separate "partnership" contra
by stefan_ 5y ago
It's hilarious that in an antitrust case, you would suggest charging 30% for everyone but 10% for some self-selected group through separate "partnership" contracts.
- MagnumOpus 5y agoIt is not funny, it is a sad reflection on how incentives on corporate litigation work. (And in case you missed it, he didn't suggest it as the best moral/legal outcome, but as a better strategy for Apple Inc to continue abusing their monopoly unchallenged).