> Is the critic calling that into question? Are they? > The core of this critique is that ivermectin may not have been used consistently among the treatment g

> Is the critic calling that into question? Are they? > The core of this critique is that ivermectin may not have been used consistently among the treatment group, therefore negative results may be masked, or confounding variables may be present. Yes. > I would like more info about all this. I don't think it's as simple as "bad study move on". Ok: https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1425297498042556423 https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1425297498042556423 Or was that not the info you meant?