4 ms·
>unless you need a package that is only in Python (somewhat rare). That's basically most of scientific/numerical computing.
by eli_gottlieb 5y ago
>unless you need a package that is only in Python (somewhat rare).
That's basically most of scientific/numerical computing.
- bmitc 5y agoAnd yet, people are using Python on much more for things that never touch Numpy, Pandas, or machine learning libraries. Also, Python isn't the only source for scientific computing. Although, I'm a bit frustrated Microsoft didn't see F# as a Python competitor early on and poured resources into it like they did with Visual Studio Code or TypeScript.
- mellavora 5y agoR you forgetting another language which is useful for scientific/numerical computing? Would Matlab count?