> Really? Do you have proof of this is result of extraordinary nurture. > Just because people don't have adequate explanations for nurture doesn't make it an a

> Really? Do you have proof of this is result of extraordinary nurture. > Just because people don't have adequate explanations for nurture doesn't make it an automatic "genetics". All it means is that they don't have adequate explanations. Your question is the equivalent of "Since you cannot provide evidence, I must be right." This is a fallacy. The other party's lack of evidence does not strengthen your position.