> There is nothing wrong with having both types of engineers. Acksherly, yes there is. In this context, there is: The world doesn't need engineers "constantly

> There is nothing wrong with having both types of engineers. Acksherly, yes there is. In this context, there is: The world doesn't need engineers "constantly pushing the limits of materials" when building bridges; let's stick with proven, boring, regulator endorsed practices and techniques for that.