2 ms·

I’ve had the same gmail address since GMail was in beta. That address is on my web site and who knows how many other sites — I use it everywhere. GMail is very

I’ve had the same gmail address since GMail was in beta. That address is on my web site and who knows how many other sites — I use it everywhere. GMail is very good at filtering spam. When something I don’t want gets through I mark it as spam and never see it again. I don’t spend more than a couple of minutes a month managing this. My spam folder is full but I don’t have to look at it. Pretty much all modern email clients can do this, GMail seems particularly good at it. I never interpret spam as an invasion or take it personally because I know it gets sent by bots from harvested lists. I give it the same attention I give to advertising flyers that land in my physical mailbox, even less attention because it’s one button click. You can add yourself to various “do not solicit” lists that may do some good.

sebastien_b 5y ago
That would be something I would do as well, however since this is a work email, it's managed by a third-party, outside my direct control; we do have a way to report (forwarding) spam email, but I think that is also limited. As I mentioned, I only get a few a week, and they usually fall into 1 of two categories: - newsletter/promotional events type emails; they're not typical phishing/spam emails (like specific keywords, bad grammar, weird URLs, etc.), and so they look 'legitimate' and the headers usually indicate they have a 'low' spam score, so that's why they make it through. One such persistent spammer is "HRTrainOnline", for which SC reports go nowhere right now. - recruiter emails; again, they don't get flagged as typical spam. Usually for these I stop getting emails from repeat offenders after ignoring them long enough, or after enough SC reports[1]. Because these don't score as 'spam' so much (but they are spam, since they're unsolicited/unwanted repeat emails), they keep getting by whatever filter our reports are feeding. As to the reason I use SC for reporting them: I want the upstream service(s) (ie. emailing services, etc.) to be made aware they have users that aren't following the law/best practices/their TOS, and take action against them. [1] there's one persistent Facebook recruiter that just kept emailing despite being ignored and reported through SC for months; finally on yet another email (following one promising they were "emailing one last time") I lashed out making it clear I had no intention of ever considering working at FB, WTH they even got the idea I would want to, and that they must be a really poor recruiter for resorting to pestering people to get responses.
- gregjor 5y ago
  Set up filters on the sender or subject line. Since it’s happening on work time you’re getting paid for your wasted time dealing with spam. Seems like a very minor problem.

sebastien_b 5y ago

That would be something I would do as well, however since this is a work email, it's managed by a third-party, outside my direct control; we do have a way to report (forwarding) spam email, but I think that is also limited. As I mentioned, I only get a few a week, and they usually fall into 1 of two categories: - newsletter/promotional events type emails; they're not typical phishing/spam emails (like specific keywords, bad grammar, weird URLs, etc.), and so they look 'legitimate' and the headers usually indicate they have a 'low' spam score, so that's why they make it through. One such persistent spammer is "HRTrainOnline", for which SC reports go nowhere right now. - recruiter emails; again, they don't get flagged as typical spam. Usually for these I stop getting emails from repeat offenders after ignoring them long enough, or after enough SC reports[1]. Because these don't score as 'spam' so much (but they are spam, since they're unsolicited/unwanted repeat emails), they keep getting by whatever filter our reports are feeding. As to the reason I use SC for reporting them: I want the upstream service(s) (ie. emailing services, etc.) to be made aware they have users that aren't following the law/best practices/their TOS, and take action against them. [1] there's one persistent Facebook recruiter that just kept emailing despite being ignored and reported through SC for months; finally on yet another email (following one promising they were "emailing one last time") I lashed out making it clear I had no intention of ever considering working at FB, WTH they even got the idea I would want to, and that they must be a really poor recruiter for resorting to pestering people to get responses.

gregjor 5y ago
Set up filters on the sender or subject line. Since it’s happening on work time you’re getting paid for your wasted time dealing with spam. Seems like a very minor problem.