Corruption is one major problem with foreign loans to Latin American nations. In theory, money that is borrowed gets put to use for programs that generate reve

Corruption is one major problem with foreign loans to Latin American nations. In theory, money that is borrowed gets put to use for programs that generate revenue. That revenue may result in taxes or may support the treasury directly in some cases, but either way the notion is that the loan generates a return that pays the debt service (or bridges the borrower over to a future cashflow that can pay the debt service of the new loan). That return can't be generated if the money is not put to good use. As a result, loans that come due are often either refunded further out, or forgiven/restructured with certain concessions. By "concessions" I mean the country makes domestic and foreign policy changes that benefit the lender in some way. Argentina tapped IMF funds during Macri's presidency despite the 2014 default. I see the 2020 default as a negotiation tactic. It's a little unreasonable to assert that a country that owes hundreds of billions of dollars lacks access to credit -- and if indeed we describe them as lacking access to credit, it's only because they have over-accessed credit in the recent past. Lending a country more money under such circumstances often compromises their ability to support self-beneficial foreign policy, and kicks the debt can further down the road. It trades a big problem today for a bigger problem tomorrow.