He's not arguing that "things would be better without government intervention". My impression was that his argument was that government shouldn't assume only th

He's not arguing that "things would be better without government intervention". My impression was that his argument was that government shouldn't assume only the risks and not the profits. Quoting from the article: "Whatever may need to be bailed out should be nationalised; whatever does not need a bail-out should be free, small and riskbearing."