3 ms·
Correct, the Moral Machine is an inherently flawed approach to its domain. Abby Evertt Jaques goes into much more detail, but the point you are pointing out
by ep103 5y ago
Correct, the Moral Machine is an inherently flawed approach to its domain. Abby Evertt Jaques goes into much more detail, but the point you are pointing out here is one of the main concerns.
Why the Moral Machine is a Monster - Abby Everett Jaques
https://robots.law.miami.edu/2019/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/MoralMachineMonster.pdf https://robots.law.miami.edu/2019/wp-content/uploads/2019/03...
- mindslight 5y agoI think that paper is still missing the bigger picture - in its own terms, the "structural effect" of framing the situation in such a paradigm to begin with. The paradigm is flawed in that it presupposes that these situations exist and could not have been avoided, thus absolving responsibility for whomever got the car into the unwinnable situation to begin with. We've already got enough of this "nobody's fault, things happen" nonsense with traditional cars. Self driving cars are capable of programmatically sticking to invariants and not becoming overwhelmed, and we should reject allowing the lazy "no fault" culture to persist.