> To those who endorse such an approach, we can only ask: How is it going? Is it working yet? What argument is the writer trying to make here? It's not functio

> To those who endorse such an approach, we can only ask: How is it going? Is it working yet? What argument is the writer trying to make here? It's not functioning well. Neither is complete lack of censorship. All that says is we haven't found the right balance. Frankly, this article just reads like promotional copy to me.