4 ms·

I mention this in the post itself

• lights0123 5y ago
  You mention that they're advertised in the amount of compressed data that can be stored, not that they actually compress data themselves. I thought you meant that they assume you use a compression algorithm yourself.
  • benjojo12 5y ago
    Ah, ok fair enough! I should have pointed that out more clearly!
• throw0101a 5y ago
  You wrote: > Drives above LTO-4 have built-in hardware encryption, however I would steer away from using it and instead just encrypt data yourself (possibly with the tool I helped make called age!). Like most things, you should also consider compressing your data before encrypting and writing it to tape. LTO tape capacities are often quoted in their “compressed capacity” which is a little cheeky since it assumes basically over a 50% compression ratio, this is not at all likely to be true if you are writing video or other lossy mediums like images etc to the tape. I generally run my data through zstd to compress and then age to encrypt. Zstd and age are quite fast and I’ve not found them to impede performance noticeably. If someone is not familiar with tape drives, I think it would be easy not to realize that the compression is built into drives like the explicitly called out "built-in hardware encryption".