What's interesting to me personally is that no matter where someone stands on their political spectrum, they may interpret Substack's guidelines http://substack

What's interesting to me personally is that no matter where someone stands on their political spectrum, they may interpret Substack's guidelines http://substack.com/content http://substack.com/content very differently. I find myself standing with what Substack are saying in this post, and yet after reading their guidelines, I can see someone attempting to forge an argument for censoring the topics discussed in their post (promotion of vaccine distrust and misinformation) in the name of preventing harmful activities. Of course, on the other hand, and this is where I believe to stand with Substack–what someone may find to be the promotion of vaccine distrust or misinformation, another may find as healthy discourse on the topic. Ultimately, in my opinion, we should let people decide on their own and not let tech companies masquerade as arbiters of truth.