> the most effective thing in terms of science per dollar > muscling other science out of funding But we don't need four LHCs. We do need a way of observing d

> the most effective thing in terms of science per dollar > muscling other science out of funding But we don't need four LHCs. We do need a way of observing dim and distant infrared light with high resolution. There's no other instrument that can observe EM radiation from 13 billion years ago. So it's not one or the other; something like the JWST was going to be built sooner or later.