3 ms·
never heard of her. Just checked her channel and every episode is her in a tube top and short shorts. Maybe she's technical, but the way shes dressed is clearly
by penjelly 5y ago
never heard of her. Just checked her channel and every episode is her in a tube top and short shorts. Maybe she's technical, but the way shes dressed is clearly with the intent to draw people in sexually.
When she leaves the house she puts on a full set of clothes, so even shes consciously aware of how she looks in her videos.
From what ive seen, she doesnt deserve demonetization because youtube has worse.. and shes providing educational content but its clear to me where the controversy lies, education + intentional sexual appeal. Id bet a large part of her audience is 10-18
- bspammer 5y ago> Maybe she's technical, but the way shes dressed is clearly with the intent to draw people in sexually. She explains herself well enough in this comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30097069 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30097069 I also take issue with the word "but" in your sentence, as though the latter discredits the former.
- SexyCyborg 5y ago> Just checked her channel and every episode is her in a tube top and short shorts. Maybe she's technical, but the way shes dressed is clearly with the intent to draw people in sexually. No. I look how I've always looked. My clothing is about gender expression and visibility and is common within my LGBT niche. That appearance sometimes helps, it sometimes hurts, I don't object to those followers that like it but I also don't cater to them. >When she leaves the house she puts on a full set of clothes, so even shes consciously aware of how she looks in her videos. You mean in the winter? Why would I wear hot pants outside in the winter?