> She pretends to be some women's rights activist when she's really just a > purveyor of some weird type of titillation. I don't see why she can't both be a wo

> She pretends to be some women's rights activist when she's really just a > purveyor of some weird type of titillation. I don't see why she can't both be a women's rights activist and be a "purveyor of some weird type of titillation". It gets dangerously close to another ugly argument: that immodest clothing diminishes the culpability of a rapist.