See what the judge said[1], specifically: > The labels themselves are neither false nor defamatory; to the contrary, they constitute protected opinion. All me

See what the judge said[1], specifically: > The labels themselves are neither false nor defamatory; to the contrary, they constitute protected opinion. All media sources hide behind "being just entertainment and not factual opinion" just like the New York Times or MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, who, when she was sued for saying OAN is "paid Russian propaganda”, won the case because “The statement could not reasonably be understood to imply an assertion of objective fact, and therefore, did not amount to defamation”[2] even though MSNBC couldn't prove OAN was paid by Russia. [1]: https://wattsupwiththat.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Facebook-admits-its-fact-check-is-opinion-page-2.pdf https://wattsupwiththat.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Faceb... [2]: https://thehill.com/homenews/media/568213-oan-loses-appeal-in-defamation-lawsuit-against-rachel-maddow https://thehill.com/homenews/media/568213-oan-loses-appeal-i... "paid Russian propaganda”