4 ms·
IMO the real point here is that many content creators/streamers want to have their cake and eat it too. On the one hand they want to be classified as family-fri
by ddtaylor 5y ago
IMO the real point here is that many content creators/streamers want to have their cake and eat it too. On the one hand they want to be classified as family-friendly so they can target their content to children, which is the audience with the highest advertising margins and merchandising opportunities. On the other hand they want to push a sexual image to gain increased views.
Most would agree that pushing sexualized content onto 13 year old deliberately is unethical.
You see the same tug of war battle happening on Twitch.tv with the constant rise of some exotic-like content (hot tub streaming, boob "ASMR", etc.) followed eventually by some token bans so that Amazon can make it look like they aren't willingly promoting that content.
- SexyCyborg 5y agoMy videos are all marked "not for children".
- touisteur 5y agoWhich is a shame. They're all watching animes, mangas and I want my girls to one day see all the cool things one can do with 3d printers and that you can be dressed in whatever you like and be awesome, and call BS on bad ventilators or bad security practices, and still be respectful of your moral roots and parents and live safely in an authoritarian place... I hope YT realize one day that your content is far better and rich than the false medical ads they're pushing sometimes on kids playlists... And that an less evil alternative emerges.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]