3 ms·
Well in this case he's signalling support for censorship, so you can't really call that virtuous.
by pumaontheprowl 5y ago
Well in this case he's signalling support for censorship, so you can't really call that virtuous.
- Barrin92 5y agoThere are people out there who care more about the truth and acknowledge that such a thing exists than giving every crazy person a megaphone. If we want to live in a circus where people who have no idea what they're talking about get to disseminate lies while thousands of people die preventable deaths every day we've lost our collective minds.
- breakyerself 5y agoIf Joe Rogan had the head of NAMBLA on and leant him a sympathetic ear would you have Rogans back?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- BeefWellington 5y agoIs he though? He asked them to remove JRE or remove his catalog. He's exercising his choice to remove himself from the platform because he doesn't want to be associated with Spotify and the people they employ. Supporting censorship would be more along the lines of asking the government to jail Rogan, erasing his content, etc. Spotify has actually removed certain JRE episodes from the available catalog as a condition of their deal.[1] [1]: https://nypost.com/2021/04/09/spotify-quietly-deletes-controversial-joe-rogan-experience-episodes/ https://nypost.com/2021/04/09/spotify-quietly-deletes-contro...