3 ms·

The most interesting part of their training is that they only talk about actions that employees should be taking or not. It never considers the end result: bein

The most interesting part of their training is that they only talk about actions that employees should be taking or not. It never considers the end result: being a monopoly. In other words, being monopolist is just fine, as long as people don't do any action that can be used as evidence against the company.

eru 5y ago
Companies care whether a court of law could find them to be a monopoly (in jurisdictions where that is a problem). Somewhat generalized, they also care about the court of public opinion. Both kinds of courts rely heavily on interpretation and on words. They don't ascertain objective truths. Things revealed in proceedings in a court of law can often be used against you in the court of public opinion, too.
- coliveira 5y ago
  What you're saying doesn't disprove my point. Obviously they care about external perceptions, but this doesn't mean they think being a monopoly is a problem. In fact they want to achieve this result without the public realizing it.
  - eru 5y ago
    Yes. I didn't mean to disprove that point.