The minutes of the meeting do not indicate anything about a library ban; that seems to be a novelty introduced by the article itself rather than being a piece o

The minutes of the meeting do not indicate anything about a library ban; that seems to be a novelty introduced by the article itself rather than being a piece of reporting. In fact, those minutes indicate that the exact same book is being used in a freshman high school curriculum in the same county, which rather casts doubt on the assertion. I should also be clear that, when I say I find the reasoning dubious, I do not mean to suggest that it is not based on a genuinely-held belief. I simply mean I think they're being unrealistic about what kids know/say.