4 ms·
I feel you’re dramatically underselling it - the book has also (reportedly; edit may have not been) been banned from the school libraries. But furthermore, the
by 542458 5y ago
I feel you’re dramatically underselling it - the book has also (reportedly; edit may have not been) been banned from the school libraries.
But furthermore, the reasons given strike me as extremely silly - I can’t remember any even mildly titillating nudity in Maus - the only nudity I can recall are piles of stripped corpses. And the idea that the phrase “god damn” is somehow inappropriate when coming from the testimony of a survivor of mass slaughter strikes me as bizarre. This sort of moralistic kneejerking is dangerous - something superficially objectionable can be found in a great many works of key significance. The girl at the napalm bombing of Trang Bang village is full frontal nudity - should we erase that powerful image from anything our children might learn? Sometimes nudity and profanity are simply a matter of what happened, and exorcising them means teaching a watered down version of the truth.
- throwaway0a5e 5y agoRegardless, it's categorically different than trying to ban the book for its subject matter. They literally spend a couple pages of meeting minutes arguing about whether suitable replacements with less vulgarity can be found, clearly they take no issues with teaching the holocaust. This is a bunch of self important educators banning a book over stuff that doesn't matter, not a bunch of ideologues banning a book because they don't like the message as one would think based on TFA and most of the comments in here.