3 ms·
When YouTube is on the same level with utility companies, then your argument does not hold. The size and specificity of YouTube service makes it an utility comp
by AdrianB1 5y ago
When YouTube is on the same level with utility companies, then your argument does not hold. The size and specificity of YouTube service makes it an utility company, not a small country club that can select the customers as they want.
- nickthegreek 5y agoISPs aren’t even classified as public utilities. Maybe that’s a better place to start.
- AdrianB1 5y agoYoutube is not an ISP, but you are right, ISP is also a (different type of) utility.
- ehsankia 5y ago> When YouTube is on the same level with utility companies Well that day is not today, and you can live just fine without being able to post to Youtube. The majority of Americans don't post to Youtube and they live just fine. Also, for the majority of human history, it was literally impossible to have your opinions broadcasted to millions of people across the globe, let alone do it for free. So no, nothing about being able to post a video on Youtube is a "right" or a "necessity". Nor is it in any shape of form comparable to utilities.