3 ms·
The other side of the argument though, is the "reduce existential risk" part. There probably isn't anything meaningful I could do, to reduce the risk of some fu
by jacobr1 5y ago
The other side of the argument though, is the "reduce existential risk" part. There probably isn't anything meaningful I could do, to reduce the risk of some future war against aliens. But with AI, the presumption is that the risk is near and that AI research going on right now could meaningfully impact future AGI designs. AI research, say, 80 years ago wouldn't have the same tradeoff. I'm not sure I buy the assumptions, but the argument does require an assumption of near-term influence (albeit it allows that that influence to be very small).
- lacker 5y agoThere probably isn't anything meaningful I could do, to reduce the risk of some future war against aliens. Not your primary point, but I think we can reduce the risk of losing some future war against aliens by discovering the aliens sooner. The Aztecs would have been a lot better off if they had realized Cortés was coming a decade earlier....