4 ms·
First, apologies for slight snugness of that that reply - probably not needed, and I've received some probably well deserved downvotes for that. Second, it doe
by nu11ptr 5y ago
First, apologies for slight snugness of that that reply - probably not needed, and I've received some probably well deserved downvotes for that.
Second, it does prove my point in that the poster referred to the "unvaccinated" as a single group, a position that I'm suggesting results in a very inaccurate set of conclusions (which other responders have commented on) because of skewed cohorts.
Third, I most definitely do NOT have it all figured out - I'm as confused as anybody else on most of this stuff, which is why my post was on a single focused point, and not on issues where I have an opinion, but much less research and data supporting my position.
Lastly, I've read all the replies and thought it was good discussion. I didn't see anything to suggest I hadn't thought it through or disprove my position, just disagreements on how useful it would or wouldn't be, which is fair.
- djmips 5y agoThat's a reasonable answer. I appreciate that. I agree on your main point.