> If you are a rational person who wants to see good science and are unemotional and detached from outcomes, then you will want to see proper study cohorts, an

> If you are a rational person who wants to see good science and are unemotional and detached from outcomes, then you will want to see proper study cohorts, and combining prior infection in with the "unvaccinated" cohort, is just bad science. Not sure what you mean. Science detached from outcomes is bad science. Science is trying to suss out cause and effect, not to avoid reality. > This bad science fuels the anti-vaxx movement even more, and honestly, it is hard blame them. Ah. There it is. Nope. It's still easy to blame them. It's not a sufficient criticism to cede moral superiority. "You didn't adjust your tone to distinguish 'unvaccinated' from 'immune-because-infected' from 'vaccinated'." does not suggest that antivaxxers are any less morally bankrupt for promoting the course of action which results in serious illness and death.