4 ms·
That's not a whole range of ambitions. It's either "Get bought" or Facebook/Google. "During the acquisition talks, ... The one refrain we heard quite often wa
by hello_moto 19y ago
That's not a whole range of ambitions. It's either "Get bought" or Facebook/Google.
"During the acquisition talks, ... The one refrain we heard quite often was from Paul, who reminded us in nearly every conversation: "Deals fall through!"
Seems like you were shopping Reddit.com vigorously. Let's do a naive calculation:
1. YComb startup: 3-4 people - $20k - $25k
2. Assume Acquisition price: $5M to $10M
3. Assume 6% shares: $300k - $600k
4. Assume 10% shares: $500k - $1M
5. Minus lawyer, legal stuff: $10k - $20k
Profit:
6% - at least $250k - able to fund at least 5-6 more YCs
10% - at least $450k - able to fund at least 12 more YCs
Assuming half companies died, you still can fun tons more.
Now, if you look at the companies you funded, probably only 1 company out of 5 that can stand as long as Loopt. Others are just developing "feature". "Feature" companies should be flipped ASAP otherwise they're not going to stay long. Logically, it's true that you'll make more money if the companies don't sell early, but the odd says otherwise, you have to sell most of your companies if YC wants to sustain itself.
YC has a good business model I'd say. Plus you are elevating your value in public (think of conference, talks, book agreements and such) and building your network with all the bigs in Sillicon Valley (companies and VC).
- pg 19y agoWe didn't shop reddit. Conde Nast found them. We didn't even know anyone at Conde Nast till they bought reddit. Nor would we intentionally fund a startup that had no prospect of making money as an independent company. It's crazy to count on getting bought, because acquirers are so unpredictable.
- gyro_robo 19y agoYou actually thought all the startups you funded could make money as independent companies, at the time you funded them? I thought your model was a kind of a "throw it at the wall and see what sticks" approach. Then triage the promising ones, with the explicit understanding that a lot of the startups would lack prospects.
- staunch 19y agoGoogle was a feature on Yahoo's site. They would have even sold their "feature company" were anyone willing to pay enough for the value they knew they had created.